Comparison of rate of canine retraction with conventional molar anchorage and titanium implant anchorage.

نویسندگان

  • Badri Thiruvenkatachari
  • Pavithranand Ammayappan
  • Rajasigamani Kandaswamy
چکیده

INTRODUCTION Various anchorage techniques have been designed for canine retraction. Intraoral techniques have not always been successful, and now implants are widely used for this purpose. A new type of titanium microimplant, with a small diameter and a button-like head, was shown to be an effective source of anchorage for distal movement of the canines. The purposes of this study were to measure and compare the rates of canine retraction with titanium microimplant anchorage and conventional molar anchorage. METHODS The sample comprised 12 patients (8 female, 4 male; mean age, 19.7 years; range, 16-22 years) who were scheduled for extraction of all first premolars. After leveling and aligning, titanium microimplants 1.2 mm in diameter and 9 mm in length were placed between the roots of the second premolar and the first molars. The implants were placed in the maxillary and mandibular arches on the same side in 10 patients and in the maxilla only in 2 patients. A brass wire guide and a periapical radiograph were used to determine the implant position. After 15 days, the implants and the molars were loaded with closed coil springs with a force of 100 g for canine retraction. Preretraction and postretraction lateral cephalograms were taken and superimposed for measuring the amount of retraction. The amount of canine retraction was measured from pterygoid vertical in the maxilla and SN perpendicular in the mandible. RESULTS Mean canine retraction amounts were 4.29 mm in the maxilla and 4.10 mm in the mandible on the implant-anchorage side, and 3.79 mm in the maxilla and 3.75 mm in the mandible on the molar-anchorage side. The rates of canine retraction were 0.93 mm per month in the maxilla and 0.83 mm per month in the mandible on the implant-anchored side, and 0.81 mm per month in the maxilla and 0.76 mm per month in the mandible on the molar-anchored side. CONCLUSIONS Canine retraction proceeds at a faster rate when titanium microimplants are used for anchorage.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Comparison and measurement of the amount of anchorage loss of the molars with and without the use of implant anchorage during canine retraction.

INTRODUCTION The purpose of this study was to compare and measure the amount of anchorage loss with titanium microimplants and conventional molar anchorage during canine retraction. METHODS Subjects for this study comprised 10 orthodontic patients (7 women, 3 men) with a mean age of 19.6 years (range, 18 to 25 years), who had therapeutic extraction of all first premolars. After leveling and a...

متن کامل

Comparative photoelastic study of dental and skeletal anchorages in the canine retraction

OBJECTIVE To compare dental and skeletal anchorages in mandibular canine retraction by means of a stress distribution analysis. METHODS A photoelastic model was produced from second molar to canine, without the first premolar, and mandibular canine retraction was simulated by a rubber band tied to two types of anchorage: dental anchorage, in the first molar attached to adjacent teeth, and ske...

متن کامل

Canine retraction and anchorage loss self-ligating versus conventional brackets: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND The purpose of this systematic review is to identify and review the orthodontic literature with regards to assessing possible differences in canine retraction rate and the amount of antero-posterior anchorage (AP) loss during maxillary canine retraction, using conventional brackets (CBs) and self-ligating brackets (SLBs). METHODS An electronic search without time or language restri...

متن کامل

Anchorage condition during canine retraction using transpalatal arch with continuous and segmented arch mechanics.

OBJECTIVE To compare anchorage condition in cases in which transpalatal arch was used to enhance anchorage in both continuous and segmented arch techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty cases that required first premolar extraction for orthodontic treatment and transpalatal arch to enhance anchorage were included in this study. Ten cases were treated using the continuous arch technique, while...

متن کامل

Effects of the zygoma anchorage system on canine retraction.

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of the Gjessing (PG) retraction spring used with and without the zygoma anchorage system (ZAS) on canine retraction. Thirty patients, with an Angle Class I or Class II malocclusion, whose upper first premolars were scheduled for extraction, were divided into two equal groups. Group 1 comprised maximum anchorage cases (nine females and six males w...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics

دوره 134 1  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2008